1980-VIL-22-SC-DT

Equivalent Citation: [1981] 130 ITR 184 (SC), 1981 AIR 1766, 1981 (0) Suppl. SCC 81

Supreme Court of India

C.A. 222 OF 1980

Date: 02.05.1980

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, MADRAS

Vs

ANDHRA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE

BENCH

Commissioner of Income-Tax, Madras Versus Madras Stock Exchange Limited

JUDGMENT

This appeal by special leave is covered by the judgment of this court in CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce [1965] 55 ITR 722 and in Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association [1980] 121 ITR 1. It is clear from the judgment in CIT v. Andhra Chamber of Commerce, that the objects of the Andhra Chamber of Commerce fell within the last head of charitable purpose denoted by the words " advancement of any other object of general public utility " and were, therefore, charitable within the meaning of s. 2(15) of the I.T. Act, 1961, unless it could be shown that they involved the carrying on of any activity for profit. The words " not involving the carrying on of any activity for profit " came up for consideration before this court in Addl. CIT v. Surat Art Silk Cloth Manufacturers Association, and there it was held by the majority of the judges that it was only where the predominant object and the purpose of the activity carried on was to earn profit, that the object could be said to involve the carrying on of an activity for profit but if the predominant object was to subserve the charitable purpose then the inhibition of these last 9 words would not be attracted. It is clear from the facts set out in the judgment of the High Court that profit-making was not the predominant object of the activity carried on by the Andhra Chamber of Commerce but the predominant object was to promote trade and commerce which was an object of general public utility. The High Court was, therefore, right in taking the view that the objects of the Andhra Chamber of Commerce fell within the last category of charitable purpose given in s. 2(15) of the Act and its incomes was exempt from tax under s. 11(1) of the Act.

The appeal is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

S.L.P. (Civil) No. 4165 of 1979, S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 4166-71 of 1979, S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 4172-75 of 1979 and S.L.P. (Civil) Nos. 3779 of 1979 are also dismissed.

Appeal and Petitions dismissed.

 

DISCLAIMER: Though all efforts have been made to reproduce the order accurately and correctly however the access, usage and circulation is subject to the condition that VATinfoline Multimedia is not responsible/liable for any loss or damage caused to anyone due to any mistake/error/omissions.